Creative Commons License

Admin's work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 License.

Sep 10, 2010 06:55 PM UTC

Login

Admin Menu

Featured links

[hide]

TypewriterKing Home

TK's Greatest Journal Blog

Typewriter Schtuff

Shoutbox

[hide]

admin, 09:38 UTC, Sat 05 of Sep, 2009: Good things coming soon!

admin, 02:42 UTC, Fri 03 of Aug, 2007: Don't give up the ship!

admin, 01:51 UTC, Tue 03 of Jul, 2007: Test.

alinasandor, 20:53 UTC, Sun 10 of Jun, 2007: :P First and last name at msn.com or ask Cindio

admin, 02:11 UTC, Mon 28 of May, 2007: You have an email address?

Read More…

Google

Style: typewriter.css

Tip Jar

Amazon Honor System

Top Pages

1)	LicensePage
2)	HomePage
3)	NewsFeeds
4)	searchwords
5)	BlogRoll
6)	Anti-Federalist Papers
7)	Gordian Knot Edit
8)	Book Reviews
9)	RulesPage
10)	Essays

Stats for quiz:Gore or Kaczynski?

list quizzes quiz stats this quiz stats edit this quiz admin quizzes

Quiz stats

User	date	time taken	points	result	P/F
	Sat 12 of Jan, 2008 [03:18 UTC]	325 secs	4 (66.67%)	result (details)	F
admin	Sat 02 of Jun, 2007 [12:46 UTC]	1180788390 secs	3 (50.00%)	result (details)	F

Page: 1/1

Stats for this quiz Questions

Question: The twentieth century has not been kind to the constant human striving for a sense of purpose in life. Two world wars, the Holocaust, the invention of nuclear weapons, and now the global environmental crises have led many of us to wonder if survival - much less enlightened, joyous, and hopeful living - is possible. We retreat into the seductive tools and technologies of industrial civilization, but that only creates new problems as we become increasingly isolated from one another and disconnected from our roots.

Option	Votes	Average
Gore	2	100.00%

Question: It is not necessary for the sake of nature to set up some chimerical utopia or any new kind of social order. Nature takes care of itself: It was a spontaneous creation that existed long before any human society, and for countless centuries, many different kinds of human societies coexisted with nature without doing it an excessive amount of damage. Only with the Industrial Revolution did the effect of human society on nature become really devastating

Option	Votes	Average
Kaczynski	2	100.00%

Question: Modern industrial civilization, as presently organized, is colliding violently with our planet's ecological system. The ferocity of its assault on the earth is breathtaking, and the horrific consequences are occurring so quickly as to defy our capacity to recognize them, comprehend their global implications, and organize an appropriate and timely response. Isolated pockets of resistance fighters who have experienced this juggernaut at first hand have begun to fight back in inspiring but, in the final analysis, woefully inadequate ways.

Option	Votes	Average
Kaczynski	1	50.00%
Gore	1	50.00%

Question: The positive ideal that is proposed is Nature. That is, wild nature: those aspects of the functioning of the Earth and its living things that are independent of human management and free of human interference and control.

Option	Votes	Average
Kaczynski	2	100.00%

Question: The modern individual on the other hand is threatened by many things against which he is helpless: nuclear accidents, carcinogens in food, environmental pollution, war, increasing taxes, invasion of his privacy by large organizations, and nationwide social or economic phenomena that may disrupt his way of life.

Option	Votes	Average
Gore	2	100.00%

Question: Any child born into the hugely consumptionist way of life so common in the industrial world will have an impact that is, on average, many times more destructive than that of a child born in the developing world

Option	Votes	Average
Kaczynski	2	100.00%

Wiki

Blogs

Articles

Image Galleries

File Galleries

Forums

Directories

[ Execution time: 0.27 secs ] [ Memory usage: Unknown ] [ 225 database queries used ] [ GZIP Disabled ] [ Server load: 5.81 ]